Reviewer Guidelines

Criteria for Reviewing

Reviewers are asked to assess the quality, originality, and significance of submitted manuscripts. Reviews should provide constructive comments, identify strengths and weaknesses, and recommend improvements.

Peer-Review Policy

All manuscripts undergo a rigorous peer review process involving at least two experts in the field. Reviewers remain anonymous to authors, and decisions are based solely on scholarly merit.

Review Process

Once invited, reviewers should confirm their availability and complete reviews within the stipulated time. If unable to review, please inform the editorial office promptly.

Key Points

  • Assess the manuscript’s scientific rigor and relevance.
  • Provide constructive feedback and clear recommendations.
  • Maintain confidentiality and disclose any conflicts of interest.

Types of Articles

The journal accepts original research articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, and editorials related to autism and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Review Transfer

If a manuscript is not suitable for this journal but may fit another journal, reviewers may consent to transfer their reviews to the appropriate journal to expedite publication.